The Contradicting Gorgias Philosophy On The Non Existent Philosophy Essay

The Contradicting Gorgias doctrine On The Non Existent Philosophy EssayExistence, this word affects many primitive philosophers. One of these is Gorgias, he is a nihilist or a person who believes no affaire exists, or that the world is incomprehensible, and that the concept of truth is fictitious. He said that Nothing exists Even if something exists, zilch ordure be known about it and Even if something roll in the hay be known about it, knowledge about it finisht be communicated to new(prenominal)s. Even if it can be communicated, it cannot be understood.Heideggersays that the fundamental problem of metaphysics is why in that location be existences rather than nothing. As it happens, and as Heidegger was accepted aware, there was an answer to this in the earliest days of Greek philosophical system.Parmenidessaid, For you could not know that which is not (that is im possible) nor verbalize it for the same thing can be theme as can be the same thing exists for presuppo seing as for being. That which can be spoken and thought must be for it is possible for it, still not for nothing, to be that is what I bid you ponder The Presocratic Philosophers, G.S. Kirk J.E. Raven, Cambridge University Press, 1964, pp.269-270. The short answer is thus that beings exist rather than nothing because therecannot benothing.1The argument that Parmenides offers is that for us to bet about something or verbalise about something, there must be something but nothing by definition is not something. Therefore, we cannot think about it or talk about it, and should not. In other words, we cannot properly use the concept and when we dont, things interchangeable coming into being and perishing. which require non- founding, stop to exist.B. Statement of the problemThis study sought to prove that the doctrine of Gorgias about the Non- existent is wrong. The researchers also sought the answers to the following questions1. What is universe of discourse?2. How something can e xist?3. How can you sure that something is really existing?C. Significance of the studyThe researchers hope that the take onings of this study helps and give new ideas to the readers. As foresighted as the other philosophers that actually contradicted to Gorgias that this also has the point of view.2D. Scope and limitationThis research contained the contradicting ism of the researchers towards to the philosophy of Gorgias about the Existence. This contains the different perspectives of various philosophers.CHAPTER 2OVERVIEW ABOUT THE EXISTENCEA. The ExistenceAccording to Wikipedia, The word existence comes from theLatinwordexisteremeaning to appear, to arise, to become, or to be, but literally, it means to stand out. It says that the existence can actually define when something is recognized. Some says that, it is theworldwe areawareor consciousof through our superstars, and thatpersists individually without them.Others define it to be everything that most people believein. When something is already existed in that kind of instance belike it would already knew by others. It is affirmative to the question of whether it is and so when we say existence it is always actual and foreign by its nature. And according to Schopenhauer birdcalled that everything that exists for knowledge, and hence the whole of this world, is only object in relation to the subject, perception of the perceiver, in a word, representation.According to him there can be No object without subject because everything objective is already conditioned as such in manifold ways by the discerning subject with the forms of its knowing, and presupposes these forms. physicalismholds that the only thing that exists ismatter that all things are composed of material, and all phenomena or consciousness are the result of material interactions.3B. BeingThe word being is a noun. According to Gilsons theory, it signifies either a being (that is, the substance, nature, and essence of anything existent), o r being itself, a property common to all that which can justly be said to be. The same word is the present participle of the verb to be. As a verb, it no nightlong signifies something that is, nor even up existence in general, but rather the very act whereby any given veracity actually is, or exists. Let us call this act a to be, in contradistinction to what is commonly called a being. It appears at once that, at least to the mind, the relation of to be to being is not a correlative one. Being is conceivable to be is not. We cannot possibly conceive an is except as belonging to some thing that is, or exists. But the reverse is not true. Being is quite conceivable apart from actual existence so much so that the very first and the most universal of all the distinctions in the acres of being is that which divides it into two classes, that of the real and that of the possible. Whether or not an object is present in a unbending that is, exists there as a being, is based on universa l experience or evidence of it. active objects are present to the experience of anyone. It is a legitimate goal therefore for philosophers of being to try to find a principle or element a something accounting for the presence of the object over the other possibility, its non-presence.In Parmenides philosophy, he begins what he takes to a self-evident truth it is. It is a truth of reason. It cannot be denied if you say, it is not, then you have proved that it is for if nothing, its not nothing, rather it is something. Parmenides believed that being is rational that only what can be thought can exist. Since nothing cannot be thought, there is no nothing, there is only being.4C. Cogito Ergo burdenThrough reasoning there is a claim that cannot be doubted when one contemplates one existence, it is not possible to have the slightest doubt that one does in fact exist (Cogito, Ergo Sum I think therefore I am) a philosophical Latin statement proposed byRen Descartes. The I in claim is not a physical person but an immaterial mind. The Cogito can only prove that I think. And he might just as well infer from it the existence of thought as the existence of I, one cannot be doubted that he thinks, therefore if you think, you are using your mind so your mind is existing.5CHAPTER 3ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONBased on the data that the researchers gathered, the researchers cannot say that there is nothing because if theres nothing, there result nothing to be explained or theres nothing to be communicate. If a man thinks, there will be a something that can explain or can communicate with, in contradiction to the philosophy of Gorgias that Nothing exists Even if something exists, nothing can be known about it and even if something can be known about it, knowledge about it cant be communicated to others. Even if it can be communicated, it cannot be understood. So if its true that it cannot be understood, therefore theres no use for him to have a philosophy of nothing because he use to know that there will no knowledge to be understood. For this reason, theres no sense of having a teacher, professor, philosopher, orator etc. if there will no way of understanding. In this case, he himself is having a non-sense philosophy of nothing because the value of a word, phrase, sentence or a paragraph is based on its knowledge that we can get from it.By the justification of Being of Parmenides, even the things that come into your mind is existing, even if its not existing the present time, it is existing in your mind. We can say that the mind is place where those particular proposition things you think exist. It is it is a truth of reason. It cannot be denied if you say, it is not, then you have proved that it is for if nothing, its not nothing, rather it is something. Parmenides believed that being is rational that only what can be thought can exist. Since nothing cannot be thought, there is no nothing, there is only being.And based on the responses of the philosophers about Existence, few of them were actually believe that there can exist. One of them is Rene Descartes perspective. The cogito(mind) can exist through thinking. It more proves that a person is existing by knowing that his mind I existing because whenever you think, you are existing.